As part of the AGM, the DRA hosted an “Ask Your Politicians” session on November 19, 2007 from 8:00 – 10:00 PM at St. Philip’s Church, immediately following the AGM business meeting.
City Councillors Suzanne Anton, David Cadman and Raymond Louie and Park Board Commissioners Ian Robertson and Loretta Woodcock kindly agreed to participate. This meeting was chaired by Robin Elliot, Professor of Law at UBC.
Streetscapes/Landscapes/Billboards
The first issue raised noted that there had been little improvement to the streetscapes in Dunbar over the years whereas other neighbourhoods had seen improvements. There was also a concern that Dunbar has a large number of “free” newspaper boxes cluttering the sidewalks. Advertising at bus stops and the billboard at 41st and Dunbar detract from the neighbourhood.
The Councillors noted that advertising at bus stops is limited to a contract the City signed several years ago. Also billboards are governed by City regulations, however within these regulations billboards can be erected on private land.
Councillor Cadman noted that even when the City has tried to have a non-conforming billboard taken down (e.g., at the Lee Building, Broadway and Main) the owner refused to do so. It is not possible to enforce the order other than for the City to remove the billboard at great (taxpayers’) expense.
There are also regulations about the number of newspaper boxes permitted and the Councillors urged residents to contact City staff to report any concerns. Due to staffing shortages, many issues rely on citizens to submit complaints.
Councillor Anton noted that Dunbar is in the process of establishing a Business Improvement Association and the BIAs in other neighbourhood have been quite effective in working with the City to effect streetscape improvements.
Pacific Spirit Park Lands
Residents commented on the recent transfer of two parcels of Pacific Spirit Park as well the University Golf Course to the Musqueam Nation as part of court-ordered negotiations related to the golf course. The Park Commissioners and the City Councillors expressed concern about the loss of park land and advised residents to convey their concerns to the Metro Vancouver Parks Committee. It was noted that Councillor Elizabeth Ball represents Vancouver on that committee.
Later in the meeting, a PSP supporter asked residents to attend the next meeting of the Metro Vancouver Board of Directors to be held November 23, 9:00 a.m. at the Metro Vancouver office, 4330 Kingsway to show their support for the Board taking a strong stand on preserving all park lands.
Supportive Housing at 16th and Dunbar
The DRA circulated an information sheet summarizing the latest information about the 12 supportive housing sites that will be developed by the City to provide social and supportive housing for low income singles who are homeless or at risk of homelessness.
The wording of the Memorandum of Understanding related to this initiative appears to indicate that the site at 16th and Dunbar St. will be used to house approximately 50 tenants, 1/3 to 1/2 of whom have a mental illness and are referred and served by a mental health service provider. The remaining 1/2 to 2/3 of the tenants would be core need (low-income) singles.
The Councillors indicated that the population to be housed at a given site will not be determined until the service providers for each site are selected. This was confirmed by Rob Whitlock, the Senior Housing Officer for the City of Vancouver Housing Centre.
Councillor Cadman noted that, while the City is pleased to see the Province providing funding for social and supportive housing, they have only committed funding for the initial planning of these sites. He also noted that the social and supportive housing proposed in this initiative is focused only on low-income singles including those with mental health and/or substance abuse issues, with no provision for low-income families or seniors.
Councillor Anton repeated her remarks from the 2006 DRA AGM that the City was prepared to address any safety concerns that neighbours had. (Also, see comments of Constable Braithwaite of the Community Policing Office in the DCP report from the Business Meeting of the 2007AGM.)
The Councillors also indicated that residents will have an opportunity to express their opinions at a Special Council Meeting to be held on the evening of December 12. After Council has heard from residents they will vote on the proposal.
Councillor Anton extended an invitation to members of the DRA Board and Vision Implementation Committee to arrange a time to visit the supportive housing facility at 39th and Fraser that opened in August of this year. The site has only been open a few months but there seems to be no problems for the neighbours.
Park Commissioner Woodcock reported anecdotally that a relative lived very close to the site, and although initially her relative had been very concerned about safety issues, she has not experienced or heard of any problems.
One important point that the Councillors made was that Vancouver was doing more than its share of providing housing for the homeless, and the surrounding municipalities needed to do more.
Proposed Development at 41st and Balaclava
A question was raised about the scope and design of a luxury condominium development proposed for 41st and Balaclava St. Emaar Properties, a development company based in Dubai, is proposing to build a 50-60 unit complex that would extend along 41st Ave from Balaclava St. to the Kerrisdale school playground and north some 300 feet to include the property where the existing lane and Knox United Church Fellowship Centre sit. The proposal currently includes at least one building as high as 8 storeys. This is considerably taller that the 4 storey maximum proposed for housing along arterials in the Dunbar Vision document. Residents are very concerned about the size of the complex and its impact on immediate neighbours in particular.
Councillor Cadman was emphatic that these projects must follow the Vision. Councillor Louie said densification projects “are happening all around the city but the overarching principle should respect the Vision process and input from neighbours.” Councillor Anton noted that there would be ample opportunity for neighbours to provide input. (However, later in the meeting, a resident pointed out that neighbours had overwhelmingly opposed the demonstration project at 39th and Dunbar St. and yet the Councillors had approved it unanimously.)
Queen Elizabeth Park Observation Tower Proposal
Residents are strongly opposed to the proposal for a privately developed and operated 60m observation tower atop QE Park. The park commissioners noted that the idea behind an observation tower at QE Park is to provide the unobstructed views that visitors previously enjoyed before the trees grew so large. It was suggested that the 360 degree view could be restored by selective removal of some trees (replacing them with younger smaller trees) and pruning of other trees.
The commissioners reported that the Park Board budget was cut by $800K last year and the Board was looking at ways to make up this loss of funds. It was also noted that visits to QE Park by tour buses are way down, perhaps due to the RAV line construction along Cambie St.
Both Commissioners noted that they were not personally very supportive of this particular tower proposal and wondered if residents might be more open to an observation tower with a more harmonious design (possibly a wooden structure) for the site.
EcoDensity
The topic of EcoDensity came up several times during the evening. Councillors Cadman and Louie are critical of this initiative, in particular that no one really knows what it means.
Councillor Cadman asked how EcoDensity proponents can promote reducing our ecological footprint while at the same time supporting the construction of big box stores (such as those proposed along SE Marine Drive) with thousands of cars converging on these stores daily. He noted that the Fraser industrial land should be retained for industrial purposes, otherwise people will be living in Vancouver and commuting to Surrey and beyond to work.
Councillor Anton assured residents that EcoDensity was not an attack on single family housing as other groups have suggested.